<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starhawk Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=starhawk-review</link>
	<description>Before we go, here is the best news blog ever.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:39:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BearTheKilla</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-262121</link>
		<dc:creator>BearTheKilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-262121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terrible review, completely misses the point. But I suppose this reviewer thinks Gears of War 3 is better. Pathetic!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrible review, completely misses the point. But I suppose this reviewer thinks Gears of War 3 is better. Pathetic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sofa_King1</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-212798</link>
		<dc:creator>Sofa_King1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 02:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-212798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have logged about 40hrs in StarHawk. The game looks great, as far as art and design is concerned, but that’s about it. It plays terrible. It truly misses the core aspects of what made Warhawk such a good game. Team work is a fun element to all multiplayer games but I shouldn’t have to rely so heavily on it to make my experience enjoyable. I have played on well-organized teams that dominated the other side and that was no fun and I’ve been on the all “noob” tour as well… pointless. This game is not balanced well at all unless everyone is on the same page. I have made this comment on other Blog postings as well, hopping Lightbox will listen. All they had to do was give Warhawk a facelift. Fresh new maps and weapons/vehicles would have been perfect. 
My Starhawk will soon be back on the shelves with so many other bad games I have returned. And I will continue logging in so many fantastic hrs. on the greatest of ALL games…WarHawk.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have logged about 40hrs in StarHawk. The game looks great, as far as art and design is concerned, but that’s about it. It plays terrible. It truly misses the core aspects of what made Warhawk such a good game. Team work is a fun element to all multiplayer games but I shouldn’t have to rely so heavily on it to make my experience enjoyable. I have played on well-organized teams that dominated the other side and that was no fun and I’ve been on the all “noob” tour as well… pointless. This game is not balanced well at all unless everyone is on the same page. I have made this comment on other Blog postings as well, hopping Lightbox will listen. All they had to do was give Warhawk a facelift. Fresh new maps and weapons/vehicles would have been perfect.<br />
My Starhawk will soon be back on the shelves with so many other bad games I have returned. And I will continue logging in so many fantastic hrs. on the greatest of ALL games…WarHawk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WilltheKilla5</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-210839</link>
		<dc:creator>WilltheKilla5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-210839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All over the comments all i see is self important blogs]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All over the comments all i see is self important blogs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soulprovider</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-210756</link>
		<dc:creator>soulprovider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 17:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-210756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@deelan - a review of a product is to be as objective as possible, the reviewer can indeed put in side comments of what he liked and what he didn&#039;t but overall they are supposed to compare it to its sequels and to discuss the different aspects of the product and how the product as a whole functions, there is no distinction between products like lawnmowers and media like books, video games, and movies. This is the job of a professional reviewer is to go through the product as open minded and objective as possible, this review did not do that regardless of getting paid or not, in fact if your getting paid to do this then someone is expecting quality work(supposed to be the case), unfortunately as time has progressed objectivity has been largely destroyed due to many corporations funding said reviewers or threatening said reviewers, and corporation and political agendas being forced into the schools and colleges from which many of our news reporters and reviewers come from. This is a trend that is going to continue until the above things are fixed, but to stereo type the first commenter because he disagrees with the way the reviewer portrays the game does not aid in matters, I hope you stop and take a moment to read someone else&#039;s post with an open mind and not insult them because they disagree with someone else&#039;s opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@deelan &#8211; a review of a product is to be as objective as possible, the reviewer can indeed put in side comments of what he liked and what he didn&#8217;t but overall they are supposed to compare it to its sequels and to discuss the different aspects of the product and how the product as a whole functions, there is no distinction between products like lawnmowers and media like books, video games, and movies. This is the job of a professional reviewer is to go through the product as open minded and objective as possible, this review did not do that regardless of getting paid or not, in fact if your getting paid to do this then someone is expecting quality work(supposed to be the case), unfortunately as time has progressed objectivity has been largely destroyed due to many corporations funding said reviewers or threatening said reviewers, and corporation and political agendas being forced into the schools and colleges from which many of our news reporters and reviewers come from. This is a trend that is going to continue until the above things are fixed, but to stereo type the first commenter because he disagrees with the way the reviewer portrays the game does not aid in matters, I hope you stop and take a moment to read someone else&#8217;s post with an open mind and not insult them because they disagree with someone else&#8217;s opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsw2112</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-210722</link>
		<dc:creator>bsw2112</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 08:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-210722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[one of the worst reviews i&#039;ve read in a while. You make no sense and don&#039;t know a thing about online mutiplayer. Go back to call of duty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one of the worst reviews i&#8217;ve read in a while. You make no sense and don&#8217;t know a thing about online mutiplayer. Go back to call of duty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamatrix</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-209976</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamatrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-209976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[??? …and how did Fable Heros (6.5) score better than Starhawk???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>??? …and how did Fable Heros (6.5) score better than Starhawk???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTF2</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-209577</link>
		<dc:creator>WTF2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 12:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-209577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ asd....WELL POSTED.
.
Free map-packs, Two games for the price of one new game ( Online usage code,) and a game that brings new life yet again too gaming in general, and this reviewer gives it 6/10? WOW.

Wonder what game he played to have given a review like this. 

EXAMPLE would be about structures &quot; majority of the time Starhawk fails to provide mechanically interesting situations to justify their existence &quot; ROFLMAO!!

STRUCTURES Mr reviewer ARE in fact what&#039;s making this game awesome, and putting it above other standard 3rd person shooters like Gears Of War as an example. Now placing an AMMO Bunker is justified for existence to ALL TEAM PLAYERS as otherwise everyone would run out? The good players can help out the not so good players, with these justified structures. LOL.

I mean what the hell is this about &quot; Starhawk is definitely a game that was made; I just don’t know if it was a game that was designed &quot; PMSL!! What ever makes the reviewer sleep at night.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ asd&#8230;.WELL POSTED.<br />
.<br />
Free map-packs, Two games for the price of one new game ( Online usage code,) and a game that brings new life yet again too gaming in general, and this reviewer gives it 6/10? WOW.</p>
<p>Wonder what game he played to have given a review like this. </p>
<p>EXAMPLE would be about structures &#8221; majority of the time Starhawk fails to provide mechanically interesting situations to justify their existence &#8221; ROFLMAO!!</p>
<p>STRUCTURES Mr reviewer ARE in fact what&#8217;s making this game awesome, and putting it above other standard 3rd person shooters like Gears Of War as an example. Now placing an AMMO Bunker is justified for existence to ALL TEAM PLAYERS as otherwise everyone would run out? The good players can help out the not so good players, with these justified structures. LOL.</p>
<p>I mean what the hell is this about &#8221; Starhawk is definitely a game that was made; I just don’t know if it was a game that was designed &#8221; PMSL!! What ever makes the reviewer sleep at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asd</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-209393</link>
		<dc:creator>asd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-209393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;&gt;It’s a solid enough premise but a majority of the time Starhawk fails to provide mechanically interesting situations to justify their existence.

If you&#039;re not on a vehicle (which are summoned by buildings) you can get run over by a vehicle (like the ridiculously fast bike) for an instant kill. Also rocket launchers and sniper rifles and such are spawned by buildings and hell BUILDING SHIT IS THE ENTIRE GAME.

Did this retard even play it?

&gt;&gt;It never appears that picking the beam laser over the sniper tower generates a meaningful advantage.
The laser tower is an automatic anti-air turret, the sniper tower is a tall platform that spawns sniper rifles for you to pick up. How the hell can you even compare them? 

&gt;&gt;And the overly abundant (and with some easy-to-find exploits, infinite) quantity of energy available during these scenarios
You don&#039;t need any exploits to get infinite energy, but there&#039;s a pretty low cap on the max amount and so you can&#039;t spam buildings. And actually charging up takes ages. The fastest way to charge up is to kill enemies but if you&#039;re killed yourself you lose your entire charge. If you have too much energy, that means you&#039;re facing a lot of enemies.

&gt;&gt;Team cooperation is imperative to victory. You need to blah blah
THIS GAME SUCKS BECAUSE TEAMS NEED TO WORK AS TEAMS

Fucking moron.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;It’s a solid enough premise but a majority of the time Starhawk fails to provide mechanically interesting situations to justify their existence.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not on a vehicle (which are summoned by buildings) you can get run over by a vehicle (like the ridiculously fast bike) for an instant kill. Also rocket launchers and sniper rifles and such are spawned by buildings and hell BUILDING SHIT IS THE ENTIRE GAME.</p>
<p>Did this retard even play it?</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;It never appears that picking the beam laser over the sniper tower generates a meaningful advantage.<br />
The laser tower is an automatic anti-air turret, the sniper tower is a tall platform that spawns sniper rifles for you to pick up. How the hell can you even compare them? </p>
<p>&gt;&gt;And the overly abundant (and with some easy-to-find exploits, infinite) quantity of energy available during these scenarios<br />
You don&#8217;t need any exploits to get infinite energy, but there&#8217;s a pretty low cap on the max amount and so you can&#8217;t spam buildings. And actually charging up takes ages. The fastest way to charge up is to kill enemies but if you&#8217;re killed yourself you lose your entire charge. If you have too much energy, that means you&#8217;re facing a lot of enemies.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;Team cooperation is imperative to victory. You need to blah blah<br />
THIS GAME SUCKS BECAUSE TEAMS NEED TO WORK AS TEAMS</p>
<p>Fucking moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-209164</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 22:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-209164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Multiplayer is amazing and there a different modes to accommodate anyone&#039;s taste.

They also announced that future map packs will be FREE!!
What a bargain!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multiplayer is amazing and there a different modes to accommodate anyone&#8217;s taste.</p>
<p>They also announced that future map packs will be FREE!!<br />
What a bargain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTF2</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-209126</link>
		<dc:creator>WTF2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-209126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And now as an added bonus from Sony when you buy Starhawk, and enter the online pass you will be given the Warhawk game for FREE to download from PS Store.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now as an added bonus from Sony when you buy Starhawk, and enter the online pass you will be given the Warhawk game for FREE to download from PS Store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starhawk Reviewers Wisely Avoid Neopaganism, Focus On Shooting People &#124; Kotaku Australia</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-209045</link>
		<dc:creator>Starhawk Reviewers Wisely Avoid Neopaganism, Focus On Shooting People &#124; Kotaku Australia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 00:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-209045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Pagan culture. Otherwise the scores would have been uniformly higher. Let&#8217;s take a look.Inside Gaming Plenty of recent games have proven that the third-person-combined-with-tower-defense genre can be [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pagan culture. Otherwise the scores would have been uniformly higher. Let&#8217;s take a look.Inside Gaming Plenty of recent games have proven that the third-person-combined-with-tower-defense genre can be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoBoDy</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-209016</link>
		<dc:creator>NoBoDy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-209016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Machinama = Xbox favorite
Gamespot = COD favorite]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Machinama = Xbox favorite<br />
Gamespot = COD favorite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-208992</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 17:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-208992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s fairly well known at this point that the game is good, everyone else seems to be giving it 8/10 and 9/10 . . . don&#039;t get why billy hated it so much but whatever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s fairly well known at this point that the game is good, everyone else seems to be giving it 8/10 and 9/10 . . . don&#8217;t get why billy hated it so much but whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deelan</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-208966</link>
		<dc:creator>Deelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 12:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-208966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope you left out the mustard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you left out the mustard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deelan</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-208965</link>
		<dc:creator>Deelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 12:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-208965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why didn&#039;t i think of reading the review of a ps3 exclusive from a completely non-bias source such as PlayStation magazine. Its genius! 

Just in case moron, that was sarcasm, and as previously mentioned you are a moron. ohh can you go ask Michael bay what he thought of Transformers for me? Thanks your a real dear.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why didn&#8217;t i think of reading the review of a ps3 exclusive from a completely non-bias source such as PlayStation magazine. Its genius! </p>
<p>Just in case moron, that was sarcasm, and as previously mentioned you are a moron. ohh can you go ask Michael bay what he thought of Transformers for me? Thanks your a real dear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mugenite</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-208964</link>
		<dc:creator>Mugenite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-208964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lost your virginity to a hotdog, eh? You have my condolences...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost your virginity to a hotdog, eh? You have my condolences&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ_Aldesso</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-208962</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ_Aldesso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-208962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your Review is Bad and you should feel Bad]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Review is Bad and you should feel Bad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deelan</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-208919</link>
		<dc:creator>Deelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 02:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-208919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just one mans opinion and its what he gets paid to do. so if your review is different feel free to cease living in your mothers basement and get a job as a reviewer. A lot of men died for freedom of speech so let this man have his and go do something constructive worm child. Well done Billy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just one mans opinion and its what he gets paid to do. so if your review is different feel free to cease living in your mothers basement and get a job as a reviewer. A lot of men died for freedom of speech so let this man have his and go do something constructive worm child. Well done Billy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Governance of Owners</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-208908</link>
		<dc:creator>Governance of Owners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 23:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-208908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lone wolf game mode would be multiplayer deathmatch mode.... which you completely fail to mention in this &quot;review&quot;.  did... did you even know there was a deathmatch mode ?  lol

You directly contradict yourself by providing an example of fun you had being a &quot;lone wolf&quot; and sneaking into an enemy base to plant turrets and rack up some kills, but then continue on to say the game fails to provide that lone wolf gameplay... the very same gameplay you JUST finished describing.  Contradicting yourself within the same review doesn&#039;t bode well for credibility.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lone wolf game mode would be multiplayer deathmatch mode&#8230;. which you completely fail to mention in this &#8220;review&#8221;.  did&#8230; did you even know there was a deathmatch mode ?  lol</p>
<p>You directly contradict yourself by providing an example of fun you had being a &#8220;lone wolf&#8221; and sneaking into an enemy base to plant turrets and rack up some kills, but then continue on to say the game fails to provide that lone wolf gameplay&#8230; the very same gameplay you JUST finished describing.  Contradicting yourself within the same review doesn&#8217;t bode well for credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankie lyons</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2012/05/07/starhawk-review/comment-page-1/#comment-208907</link>
		<dc:creator>frankie lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 23:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=32541#comment-208907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co.uk/review/starhawk-psn-review/2/ here is a more indept, more honest review of the game, just for a second opinion for anyone who like me was looking forward to a great game]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co.uk/review/starhawk-psn-review/2/" rel="nofollow">http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co.uk/review/starhawk-psn-review/2/</a> here is a more indept, more honest review of the game, just for a second opinion for anyone who like me was looking forward to a great game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
