<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hoard Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2011/04/18/hoard-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2011/04/18/hoard-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hoard-review</link>
	<description>Before we go, here is the best news blog ever.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blood_lazio</title>
		<link>http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2011/04/18/hoard-review/comment-page-1/#comment-75222</link>
		<dc:creator>blood_lazio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/?p=13971#comment-75222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A suggestion:
It is what all indie games try to achieve... It&#039;s fun, cheap and good. It&#039;s worth what you pay for it, and you can play for gold in each map, and have loads of fun even playing single player...

I think it is unfair to give it only 6, you cannot compare it with CoD, Skyrim and Battlefield. This is a totally different kind of entertainment and should be 8-9/10 for a cheap casual game. Could be please have ratings for serious and casual gaming separated?

Think about a game like Magicka... For a casual game it is maybe even 10/10, but against the big super games it might not even be 5/10...

I really like Hoard, but it is still definitely not the first game I load up when looking at my Steam library (neither is Magicka although I own and like both)...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A suggestion:<br />
It is what all indie games try to achieve&#8230; It&#8217;s fun, cheap and good. It&#8217;s worth what you pay for it, and you can play for gold in each map, and have loads of fun even playing single player&#8230;</p>
<p>I think it is unfair to give it only 6, you cannot compare it with CoD, Skyrim and Battlefield. This is a totally different kind of entertainment and should be 8-9/10 for a cheap casual game. Could be please have ratings for serious and casual gaming separated?</p>
<p>Think about a game like Magicka&#8230; For a casual game it is maybe even 10/10, but against the big super games it might not even be 5/10&#8230;</p>
<p>I really like Hoard, but it is still definitely not the first game I load up when looking at my Steam library (neither is Magicka although I own and like both)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
